Privacy? Not in a “Free” Democracy!

Taken from http://skew.dailyskew.com

Taken from http://skew.dailyskew.com

Sorry it’s taken so long to write another post – I have a few half-started articles that I just haven’t got round to finishing but I had to say something about this.

I don’t know if you remember, but back in April Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, announced an idea that she and the Government wanted to put in place.  Basically, she wanted official and Government bodies to be able to have access to your communication details.  This means your telephone calls, emails, websites that you visit, text and picture messages, basically ANY electronic communication that you might make.  This information would be stored by your telecommunications provider for a year and could be accessed by any one of 653 public bodies without a court order or judges permission, any senior official can grant it.

43 police forces in England & Wales, 8 police forces in Scotland, Police Service of Northern Ireland, British Transport Police, Port of Liverpool Police, Port of Dover Police, Royal Military Police, Royal Air Force Police, Civil Nuclear Constabulary, Ministry of Defence Police, Royal Navy Police, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, Serious Organised Crime Agency, Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency, United Kingdom Border Agency and The Prison Service as well as approximately 474 local authorities throughout the UK and approximately 110 *other* public authorities, including almost all government departments, including the Serious Fraud Office, Independent Police Complaints Commission, Charity Commission, Gambling Commission and Royal Mail to name only a few.

This would include 43 police forces in England & Wales, 8 police forces in Scotland, Police Service of Northern Ireland, British Transport Police, Port of Liverpool Police, Port of Dover Police, Royal Military Police, Royal Air Force Police, Civil Nuclear Constabulary, Ministry of Defence Police, Royal Navy Police, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, Serious Organised Crime Agency, Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency, United Kingdom Border Agency and The Prison Service as well as approximately 474 local authorities throughout the UK and approximately 110 *other* public authorities, including almost all government departments, including the Serious Fraud Office, Independent Police Complaints Commission, Charity Commission, Gambling Commission and Royal Mail to name only a few.  (Taken from the No2ID website)

The rise in popularity of the show Big Brother seems to have desensitised people from the origins of the concept.  In 1984 Big Brother was the leader of The Party who controlled the continent of Oceania.  The people were controlled by the Ministry of Truth (MiniTrue) through selective changes to the news (wiping stories containing unpersons etc…) and through telescreens.  The telescreens were almost like televisions that not only transmitted information but also had a camera could be viewed.  The telescreens were in every house and (to quote 1984):

There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live — did live, from habit that became instinct — in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized. – George Orwell 1984

This legislation is exactly the same concept, the Government can plug in to your information whenever they want, they can see who you’ve spoken to, when and for how long, they can see when you went online and what websites you visited, and they can even see who you’re emailing.  And the reason for this?  To protect us all from Terrorism.  In the words of Benjamin Franklin “People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.”

It is up to us, all of us, to stand up for our rights, the Government and Local Authorities have already proved that they can’t be trusted with this sort of power, using the powers they were previously given to spy on litterers and people who forgot to scoop their dog’s poop!

Sure, the Government might try to bring in guidelines to safeguard our privacy, but what will happen when the next Government is elected who change the guidelines “just a little”, and the next one, and the next one.  What about when they decide that the Jews, or the Gays, or those people with disabilities are anathema, and they have a record of your web browsing, they have a record of your calls.  I’m sorry to invoke Godwin’s Law but this IS the thin point of the wedge.

We have to stop this, and we have to do it now.

If you want to know more about this, or want to do something then there’s the CC Jacqui Smith group (who’ve gone a little quiet recently but I’m sure that’ll pick up soon) as well as the No2ID website.  I’d also highly recommend reading the articles by TechnicalBloke.com, or Henry Porter’s excellent article on the subject in the Guardian.


  • Share/Bookmark

Why we need ID cards

I mentioned my opinion on the government’s plans to issue all UK residents with a National ID Card when I was discussing the furore over Google Street View.  In fact this is something that I have opposed for many years now, not because I have anything to worry about – I haven’t broken the law, I’m registered for taxes and National Insurance, voting, I have a passport and a (provisional) driving license.  (Yes, I can’t drive – no matter how hard I try!)

I have a very distinctive name that I don’t try to hide online, and my job means that my name is out in the public domain every time someone writes in to the company I work for.  So it’s not that I don’t want people to know who I am.

I’m registered with loads of websites, social media sites and (as I said in that post) – I’m a big Google fan!  But why am I happy to share my details with the likes of Google Profiles, Facebook, myspace and twitter but I don’t want to give personal information to my government?  Well, it’s quite simple, the government can’t look after the information it has already.

The government have been very nice about it though, they’re telling us Why we need ID Cards, in a detailed and well thought out way, with no vagueness whatsoever.  They tell us how an ID card will help prevent against identity fraud and theft AND make sure that people are who they say they are.  Because (as we all know) most identity fraud is committed face to face in a place where an ID card be requested, as this APACS report clearly shows, oh wait – no it doesn’t!  

OK then, they can be used to “Tackle” illegal working and immigration abuse, is is just me or is “tackle” a very vague term?  And of course the first thing that most illegal workers and immigrants think of is how easy it is to to come over here and steal our jobs since we don’t have any way of identifying them like passports, National Insurance numbers…  Actually, I’m sure I can think of another political party who would love to use this as an arguement…

Ah, but wait – ID cards are the ideal way to “disrupt the use of false and multiple identities by criminals and those involved in terrorist activity.”  Because terrorists aren’t criminals, they’re something completely different that need to be disrupted by having to register their details (including fingerprints and retina scans) to get a card.  Of course if you see a criminal breaking into your house all you’ll need to do is ask to see his ID card.  And when the next terrorist plot appears to be a bomb campaign against a city the fact that the (probably British born and raised, or if not then very likely legal visitor to the country) has an ID card will be the perfect defence.

OK then, maybe the arguements aren’t completely thought through in absolute detail just yet… but surely ID cards will “ensure free public services are only used by those entitled to them and enable easier access to public services”, won’t they?

Well, if the Identity and Passport Service means that unpersons without ID Cards won’t be able to sign up for a library card or free bus pass then surely it’s worth the £5.5 billion+ that the government’s spent on it?  Isn’t it?

No.

  • Share/Bookmark

Google Street View – My Take

This Independent on Sunday article talks about (read: scaremongers) the ‘privacy concerns’ around Google Street View. It seems from the comments on the page that I’m not the only person who’s confused with this.

Firstly I really don’t understand the privacy issues involved that people keep talking about. Google simply drove around a number of public streets around the UK and took a load of still shots. This was about six months ago. Anyone could do it. But because it’s Google everyone jumps on the “evil huge corporations are taking over the world” bandwagon.
I’m a Google fan. The products they produce are useful, fun, easy to use and help to make my online life easier. I can access my Google Mail account and Google Calendar from my T-Mobile G1 and my iGoogle page keeps all of my fun and useful apps in one place. If I want to have a look for something entertaining to watch I can visit YouTube and then go to my Blogger account to discuss it in detail. Of course if I’m really desperate I suppose I can also use it to search, but that’s only at a push! ;-P In short they deliver everything I ask of them. They have a clearPrivacy Policy and have never (to my knowledge) broken this with me.
Compare this with the UK Government who have decided, against my wishes, to introduce an identity card that contains around 50 pieces of data about me. I wasn’t asked to agree to this. I wasn’t given the option of using a different organisation for my identity needs. I (like every other person who lives in the UK) have been told that this will happen. The card will contain my fingerprints and iris details (you know – the things I can’t change) and will be looked after by the same government that keeps people’s benefit details safe as well as laptops containing personal details.  Yes, that’s just one laptop, but it seems that the plural is correct

I don’t mean this to be a soapbox, but I really think that, if people are going to cry out against privacy issues, they should cry out against actual infringements before they scream and shout and stamp their feet about a company taking some photos.

And yes, my house is on street viewer, my car’s parked outside my house and do you know what? I don’t care!

  • Share/Bookmark

Switch to our mobile site